DISCOVERING FACTORS THAT AFFECT IGEN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN THE UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • NURUL NADHILAH FEIZAL Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
  • SHAHNAZ ISMAIL Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu,
  • WAN ZURIATI WAN ZAKARIA Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terenggan
  • NADIA MOHD NAWI English Language Centre, Centre of Fundamental and Continuing Education Universiti Malaysia Terengganu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46754/umtjur.v3i1.194

Keywords:

Academic performance, parent involvement, attitude, technology, iGen, Gen Z

Abstract

The advancement of technology in digital revolution such as Internet of Things has gained attention in all over the world. This myriad of technology innovations affects all aspects of the human lives today. The generation who has grown up during this era, known as the iGens, mostly relies on the technology in every aspect of their lives, including education. Thus, technology also gives profound impact in educational transformation nowadays to convey innovative education. However, lack of innovation in education becomes a challenge to meet this demand. Therefore, this study was carried out with the aim to discover factors which may affect academic performance of the iGen students in the university. A total of 250 self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the accounting students at UMT with a response rate of 93.6% (234). Using multiple regression analysis, the findings showed that parental involvement and student’s attitude contribute more towards academic performance of iGen students rather than the technology itself. This finding showed that human factor such as support from their parents and individual factor are vital towards their academic performance regardless of from technology savvy generation or not.

References

Ali, S., Haider, Z., Munir, F., Khan, H. & Ahmed, A. (2013). Factors Contributing To The Students Academic Performance: A Case Study Of The Islamia University SubCampus. American Journal Of Educational Research, 1(8),283-289.

Barnett, M. (2004). Qualitative analysis of family support and interaction among black college students at an ivy league university. Journal of Negro Education, 73(1), 53-68.

Colker, L.J., (2008). Twelve characteristics of effective early childhood teachers. J. Natl. Accoc. Educ. Young Children, 63:68-73 in the Aregbeyen, O. (2010). Students’ perceptions of effective teaching and effective lecturer characteristics at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 62-69.

Cox, D., & McLeod, S. (2014). Social media strategies for school principals. NASSP Bulletin, 98(1), 5e25 in the Lau, W. W. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in human behavior, 68, 286-291.

Daniel, B.V., Evans, S.G., & Scott, B. R. (2001). Understanding family involvement in the college experience today. New Directions for Student Services, 94, 3-13 in the Wolf, D. S. S., Sax, L., & Harper, C. E. (2009). Parental engagement and contact in the academic lives of college students. Naspa Journal, 46(2), 325-358.

Dudek, C. M., Reddy, L. A., & Lekwa, A. (2018). Measuring teacher practices to inform student achievement in high poverty schools: A predictive validity study. Contemporary School Psychology, 1–14.

Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: assessing the effectiveness of parent involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education. 78, 233-249.

Fajar, S., Hussain, M., Sarwar, H., Afzal, M. and Gilani, S.A. (2019). Factors affecting academic performance of undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Social Science and Management. 6(1), 7-16.

Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Partental involvement and students‟ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22 in the Wolf, D. S. S., Sax, L., & Harper, C. E. (2009). Parental engagement and contact in the academic lives of college students. Naspa Journal, 46(2), 325-358.

Gliem, J. A. & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach‟s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.

Giunchiglia, F., Zeni, M., Gobbi, E., Bignotti, E. and Bison, I. (2018). Mobile social media usage and academi performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 177-185.

Gould, D., Nalepa, J. & Mignano, M. (2020). Coaching generation z athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(1), 104-120.

GreGory, P., GreGory, K. & Eddy, E. (2014). The institutional network: using facebook to enhance undergraduate mathematics instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(1), 5-26.

Harper, C. E., Sax, L. J., & Wolf, D. S. S. (2012). The role of parents in college students’ sociopolitical awareness, academic, and social development. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(2), 137-156. 35.

Hijazi, S. T., & Naqvi, R. S. M. M. (2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. Bangladesh e-journal of Sociology, 3(1), 1-10.

Ismail, S., Jamaludin, N., Wan Zakaria, W.Z. & Mohd Nawi, N. (2017). A study on the accounting students’ perceptions towards teaching quality at university. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 2(5), 85-89.

Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132 in the Lau, W. W. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 286-291.

Kaviyarasi, R. and Balasubramanian, T. (2018). Exploring the potential factors that affects students’ academic performance. I.J. Education and Management Engineering, 6, 15-23.

Lau, W. W. F. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 286- 291.

Lee, P., Sattayawaksakul, D., Waleesila, S., & Sriharat, P. (2009). Asian students’ perceptions of a good college/ university teacher. Catalyst, 4(1), 3-12.

Marti-Ballester, C.P. (2019). Factors that influence academic performance: analyzing gender differences in accounting students. Revista Education, 43(2), 1-16.

Masrom, M., & Usat, S. (2015). Use of Online Social Networking and Academic Performance of Students. IGI Global. Retrieved 25 July 2019 from https://people.utm.my.

McNeal, R.B. Jr. (2014). Parent involvement, academic achievement and the role of student attitudes and behavior as mediators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 564-576.

Mensah, J.K, Okyere, M. and Kuranchie, A. (2013). Student attitude towards mathematics and performance: does the teacher attitude matter? Journal of Education and Practice. 4(3), 1-8.

Mushtaq, I. and Khan, S.N. (2012). Factors affecting students’ academic performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(9), 17-22.

Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Moss, S., Prosser, H., and Costello, H. (1998) Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 173-183.

Othman, M.N.A., Rashid, M.A.A., Ismail, I.R., Norizan, S. & Saad, S.A.M. (2019). Debunking gen z learning style : Malaysian chapter. International Journal of Advances Research in Technology and Innovation, 1(2), 1-7.

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0027268

Rodriguez, M., Boyer,S., Fleming, D. & Cohen, S. (2019). Managing the next generation of slaes, gen z/ millennial cusp : an exploration of grit, entrepreneurship, and loyalty. Journal of Business-to- Business Marketing, 26(1), 43-55.

Sandilos, L.E., Sims, W.A., Norwalk, K.E. & Reddy, L.A. (2019). Converging on quality: Examining multiple measures of teaching effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 74(2019), 10-28.

Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2011). Research Methods for Business; A skill business approach. New York: John Willey & Sons.

Stanca, L. (2006). The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics, Journal of Economic Education, 37, 251–266.

Su, F., & Wood, M. (2012). What makes a good university lecturer? Students’ perceptions of teaching excellence. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 142-155.

Tyler, J. H. (2011). Designing high quality evaluation systems for high school teachers: Challenges and potential solutions in Sadilos, L.E., Sims, W.A., Norwalk, K.E. and Reddy, L.A (2019). Coverging on quality:examining multiple measures of teaching effectiveness. Journal of School Psycholoqy, 74,10-28.

Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377-397.

Wolf, D. S. S., Sax, L., & Harper, C. E. (2009). Parental engagement and contact in the academic lives of college students. Naspa Journal, 46(2), 325- 358.

Zhang, W. (2015). Learning variables, in-class laptop multitasking and academic performance: a path analysis. Computers & Education, 81, 82-88.

Additional Files

Published

2021-01-31

How to Cite

FEIZAL, N. N. ., ISMAIL, S. ., WAN ZAKARIA, W. Z. ., & MOHD NAWI, N. . (2021). DISCOVERING FACTORS THAT AFFECT IGEN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN THE UNIVERSITY. Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.46754/umtjur.v3i1.194